Tokenization Compliance
Intelligence

The definitive independent resource for tokenized asset regulation, licensing requirements, and compliance frameworks across 30+ jurisdictions. Built for compliance officers, fund managers, and legal professionals navigating the post-GENIUS Act landscape.

📋 30+ Jurisdictions 🕑 Updated Weekly 🔒 Independent & Unbiased ⚖️ Not Legal Advice
EU MiCAENFORCED
GENIUS ActSIGNED
CLARITY ActIN CONGRESS
UAE VARAACTIVE
DTC TokenizationPILOT 2026
CFTC Crypto SprintACTIVE
UK FCACONSULTING
Singapore MASACTIVE
Saudi CMADEVELOPING
Switzerland FINMAACTIVE
EU MiCAENFORCED
GENIUS ActSIGNED
CLARITY ActIN CONGRESS
UAE VARAACTIVE
DTC TokenizationPILOT 2026
CFTC Crypto SprintACTIVE
UK FCACONSULTING
Singapore MASACTIVE
Saudi CMADEVELOPING
Switzerland FINMAACTIVE
Contents
Advertisement
Section 01

What Is Tokenization Compliance?

Tokenization compliance encompasses the regulatory requirements, licensing obligations, and operational standards governing the issuance, distribution, trading, and custody of tokenized assets. As traditional financial instruments—from real estate and bonds to equities and money market funds—are increasingly represented as digital tokens on distributed ledger technology, every major jurisdiction is developing its own framework to regulate this activity.

The challenge for market participants is that tokenization sits at the intersection of securities law, payment regulation, data protection, anti-money laundering (AML) requirements, and emerging digital asset legislation. A single tokenized real estate offering may simultaneously trigger obligations under securities regulation, property law, consumer protection rules, AML/KYC requirements, and cross-border transfer restrictions.

Compliance is not optional. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is fully enforced. Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) is actively licensing and sanctioning. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a landmark joint staff statement on tokenized securities in January 2026, clarifying that tokenization changes the plumbing but not the regulatory perimeter. For in-depth SEC tracking, see SECTokenization.com.

💡 Key Principle

Tokenization does not create a regulatory exemption. A tokenized security is still a security. A tokenized fund unit is still a fund unit. The underlying asset's regulatory classification determines the compliance framework—the token is merely the technology layer. This was reaffirmed by SEC staff in their January 2026 guidance.

Section 02

The 2026 Regulatory Landscape

The tokenized asset market has entered a period of institutional acceleration. According to industry data, the real-world asset tokenization market reached $24 billion in 2025—a 308% increase in three years. Tokenized Treasury and money market fund products surged to $7.4 billion, and the World Economic Forum identified 2026 as a defining year for scaling digital asset solutions.

$24B
RWA tokenization market 2025
$7.4B
Tokenized Treasury & MMF products
$2.9B
BlackRock BUIDL peak TVL
200+
Active institutional RWA projects

Several converging forces are reshaping the compliance landscape. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, established the first U.S. federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, requiring 100% reserve backing and monthly disclosures. The CLARITY Act, currently moving through Congress, would standardise how digital commodities are defined and create registration requirements for brokers and dealers. Meanwhile, GCC states—particularly Dubai, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain—are building competing frameworks to attract tokenization platforms. For analysis of emerging tokenization policy globally, see our sister publication.

The CFTC launched its year-long "Crypto Sprint" in August 2025, focusing on listing spot digital assets on registered exchanges and enabling derivatives market participants to use tokenized collateral, including stablecoins. In December 2025, CFTC staff issued guidance allowing futures commission merchants and clearing organisations to accept tokenized collateral for the first time. For corporate governance frameworks around these developments, see our dedicated coverage.

Section 03

Global Regulatory Frameworks Compared

Tokenization regulation now falls into five categories: comprehensive dedicated legislation (the EU's MiCA), evolving federal legislation (the U.S. GENIUS Act plus anticipated CLARITY Act), dedicated licensing regimes (the GCC model), principles-based frameworks (Switzerland's DLT Act), and frameworks still in consultation (the UK's approach).

JurisdictionRegulatorFrameworkStatusApproach
European UnionESMAMiCA + MiFID II + DORAEnforcedComprehensive legislation
United StatesSEC / CFTC / FinCENGENIUS Act + CLARITY Act + Securities ActRapid evolutionFederal legislation + guidance
UAE (Dubai)VARA / SCA / ADGMVARA RulebookActiveDedicated licensing
United KingdomFCA / HM TreasuryFSMA ExtensionConsultingPhased integration
SingaporeMASPayment Services Act + SFAActiveActivity-based licensing
SwitzerlandFINMADLT ActActivePrinciples-based
Hong KongSFC / HKMASFO + Type 1/7/9 LicencesActiveLicensing overlay
Saudi ArabiaCMA / SAMAFinTech SandboxDevelopingSandbox-first
JapanFSAFIEA + PSA AmendmentsActiveIntegrated regulation
BahrainCBBCrypto-Asset ModuleActiveDedicated regulation

Cross-border interoperability remains the most critical unresolved challenge. For detailed UAE regulatory analysis, Saudi tokenisation tracking, and Dubai VARA licensing intelligence, see our dedicated jurisdictional publications.

Section 04

Jurisdiction-by-Jurisdiction Analysis

Each jurisdiction's approach reflects its broader regulatory philosophy and positioning in the race to attract digital asset capital. Select a jurisdiction below for comprehensive compliance intelligence.

Section 05

The U.S. Regulatory Shift

The U.S. regulatory landscape for tokenized assets changed dramatically in 2025. As documented by Cleary Gottlieb, regulators shifted from enforcement-heavy skepticism to a determined focus on enabling market participation. The SEC dropped nearly all enforcement actions against fintechs that lacked accompanying fraud allegations, and began issuing no-action relief to digital asset issuers.

The most significant development was the DTC no-action letter issued December 11, 2025, allowing the Depository Trust Company—which handles custody for the majority of U.S. securities—to begin piloting tokenization services in 2026. DTC can now represent certain custodied securities as tokens on approved blockchains, with participant wallets screened for OFAC compliance. The pilot launches in the first half of 2026, with public rollout planned for the second half. This effectively creates a pathway to tokenize nearly all U.S. equities. For ongoing SEC enforcement and no-action tracking, see SECTokenization.com.

On January 28, 2026, SEC staff from the Divisions of Corporation Finance, Trading and Markets, and Investment Management jointly issued guidance clarifying how existing securities laws apply to tokenization structures. The guidance confirmed that tokenization changes the recording technology but not the regulatory classification—a tokenized stock remains an equity security under the Securities Act and Exchange Act.

Looking ahead, Congress appears poised to adopt a comprehensive market infrastructure bill that would establish regulatory regimes for digital asset brokers, dealers, and exchanges. As K&L Gates notes, the key theme for 2026 is the democratisation of digital assets—making them accessible without fear of enforcement action.

⚠️ Compliance Alert: Dual Jurisdiction

A single tokenized offering marketed in the EU, US, and UAE may require simultaneous compliance with MiCA, the SEC securities framework, and Dubai's VARA Rulebook—three entirely separate regimes with different definitions, classifications, and procedural requirements. See UAETokenizationRegulation.com for detailed cross-border analysis.

Advertisement
Section 06

Institutional Tokenization at Scale

BlackRock's BUIDL fund—a tokenized money market fund investing in U.S. Treasury bills—has grown to nearly $2.9 billion in total value since its March 2024 launch on Ethereum, capturing over 40% of the tokenized Treasury market. Securitize handles tokenization and transfer agent functions, while Bank of New York Mellon serves as custodian. BUIDL is now accepted as collateral on Binance, Deribit, and other major derivatives platforms. For coverage of tokenized ETF developments and tokenized money market funds, see our dedicated publications.

Franklin Templeton's BENJI fund holds approximately $894 million in tokenized assets across over 1,000 holders. Fidelity Investments launched its OnChain share class with $160 million in net assets as of January 2026. JPMorgan launched its MONY tokenized money market fund on public Ethereum in December 2025. Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon have partnered to tokenize additional money-market fund products.

The implications for compliance professionals are significant. When institutions of this scale deploy tokenization, the compliance bar rises for the entire industry. Regulatory scrutiny intensifies, due diligence requirements deepen, and the consequences of non-compliance become existential. Fireblocks notes that traditional finance commercial interests are now dictating advocacy in this space, with compliance frameworks expected to mature rapidly. For a deeper analysis of tokenization policy implications, see our policy publication.

Section 07

Core Compliance Requirements

Licensing & Registration

Nearly every jurisdiction requires firms engaged in tokenization to hold specific licences. In the EU, this means registration as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) under MiCA. In Dubai, a VARA licence specific to the activity category. In the U.S., potentially registration as a broker-dealer, ATS operator, or transfer agent with the SEC, alongside state money transmission licences—though the GENIUS Act and anticipated CLARITY Act are creating clearer pathways.

AML/KYC & the FATF Travel Rule

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule applies to token transfers identically to wire transfers. Every tokenization platform must implement customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting, and sanctions screening. OFAC compliance is now a specific condition of the DTC tokenization pilot—all registered wallets must be OFAC-screened.

Investor Protection & Disclosure

Tokenized securities offerings require the same disclosure as traditional securities: prospectus or whitepaper requirements, risk disclosures, fee transparency, and ongoing reporting. The SEC applies Regulation D, Regulation A+, and Regulation S frameworks to tokenized offerings.

Custody & Asset Segregation

Regulators require client asset segregation, adequate insurance or capital reserves, and recovery mechanisms. The SEC's January 2026 guidance specifically addresses custody arrangements for tokenized securities, noting that third-party-sponsored tokens may present different risks than issuer-sponsored ones. For analysis of governance frameworks surrounding custody, see our dedicated coverage.

Operational Resilience & Smart Contract Audits

The EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) imposes specific ICT risk management and third-party oversight requirements on firms operating tokenized instruments. Multiple jurisdictions now require independent smart contract security audits as a licensing condition.

Section 08

Compliance by Asset Class

Asset ClassRegulatory TreatmentKey DevelopmentsRegulators
Real EstateSecurities / collective investmentBDO notes U.S. firms behind international peers; IRS guidance still pendingSEC, ESMA, SCA
Bonds & Fixed IncomeSecurities regulationDTC pilot enables tokenization of custodied bond securities in 2026SEC, ESMA, FINMA
EquitiesSecurities regulationDTC no-action letter opens path to tokenize nearly all U.S. equitiesSEC, ESMA, SFC
ETFs & MMFsFund regulation + securitiesBlackRock BUIDL $2.9B; Franklin BENJI $894M; Fidelity OnChain $160M; JPMorgan MONY launched Dec 2025SEC, ESMA, MAS
Private CreditSecurities / lending regulation$575M in active tokenized private credit loans; growing institutional adoptionSEC, FCA, MAS
CommoditiesCommodity derivativesCFTC Crypto Sprint enabling tokenized collateral acceptance by FCMsCFTC, ESMA, SCA
StablecoinsGENIUS Act framework$203B market cap; 100% reserve requirement; monthly disclosure mandateTreasury, Fed, OCC
Section 09

Tokenization Compliance Checklist

✅ Pre-Launch Compliance Checklist

1. Token Classification. Determine classification under each target jurisdiction's framework—security, payment token, utility token, e-money token, or digital commodity under the anticipated CLARITY Act.

2. Licensing Requirements. Map specific licences required by activity type in each jurisdiction. EU: CASP under MiCA. UAE: VARA licence. U.S.: broker-dealer, ATS, transfer agent registration with SEC.

3. AML/KYC Programme. Implement procedures aligned with FATF Travel Rule and local requirements. Include OFAC screening for U.S.-connected activity.

4. Investor Disclosure. Prepare prospectus or whitepaper meeting each jurisdiction's requirements. Include risk factors, fee disclosures, asset information, and redemption terms.

5. Custody Arrangements. Establish compliant custody with asset segregation, insurance, and recovery mechanisms. Review SEC January 2026 custody guidance.

6. Smart Contract Audit. Commission independent security audits. Multiple jurisdictions require this as a licensing condition.

7. Data Protection. Ensure GDPR, PDPL, and applicable data protection compliance for all personal data processed.

8. Stablecoin Compliance. If using stablecoins for settlement, verify issuer compliance with GENIUS Act reserve and disclosure requirements.

9. Cross-Border Assessment. Map regulatory implications across every target jurisdiction. See UAETokenizationRegulation.com and UAETokenizationRegulations.com for GCC-specific analysis.

10. Ongoing Reporting. Establish systems for regulatory reporting, including quarterly DTC pilot reports, suspicious activity reports, and periodic filings.

Section 10

Enforcement & Penalties

Enforcement activity has shifted significantly. The SEC dropped most pre-2025 enforcement actions against fintechs that lacked fraud allegations, signalling a policy pivot toward enablement. However, this does not mean reduced scrutiny—it means more targeted, fraud-focused enforcement combined with clearer rules for compliant market participants.

Under MiCA, penalties can reach 12.5% of annual turnover or €5 million for individuals. VARA has publicly sanctioned licensed entities for compliance failures. The most common enforcement triggers remain: operating without required licensing, inadequate AML/KYC controls, misleading disclosures, and non-compliance with cross-border marketing restrictions. Enforcement increasingly involves cooperation between regulators across jurisdictions.

Section 11

CBDC, Interoperability & Settlement

The relationship between tokenized private assets and central bank digital currencies represents the next frontier of compliance complexity. The BIS Project mBridge and MAS Project Guardian are establishing standards that will govern cross-border tokenized asset transfer. For comprehensive coverage of CBDC frameworks and interoperability standards, see CBDCBridge.ai and CBDCInteroperability.com.

The Federal Reserve Board is considering development of a central bank account for certain non-depository charters that would facilitate direct access to U.S. payment rails—a development that could reshape the settlement infrastructure for tokenized securities.

Section 12

Resources & Further Reading

Primary regulatory sources: ESMA for MiCA implementation. SEC Digital Assets for U.S. guidance and no-action letters. VARA for Dubai licensing. MAS for Singapore. FINMA for Swiss DLT Act. FATF for global AML standards. Congress.gov for GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act status.

Industry bodies: IOSCO for global securities coordination. Bank for International Settlements for CBDC and tokenization standards. DTCC for U.S. securities tokenization pilot updates.

Legal analysis: Cleary Gottlieb 2026 Digital Assets Update. Sidley Austin SEC Tokenization Playbook Analysis. K&L Gates Crypto in 2026. Morgan Lewis DTC Tokenization Analysis.

Tokenization Compliance Weekly

Regulatory updates, enforcement actions, and compliance intelligence. Every Thursday. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your data.

Our Research Network — Compliance Intelligence Across Markets
TokenizationPolicy.com
Global tokenization policy analysis and legislative tracking
TokenizationGovernance.com
Corporate governance frameworks for tokenized assets
DubaiTokenisation.com
UAE VARA licensing, regulation, and market intelligence
SaudiTokenisation.com
Saudi CMA tokenization sandbox and Vision 2030 fintech
ETFTokenisation.com
Tokenized ETF regulation and institutional adoption tracking
SECTokenization.com
SEC enforcement, no-action letters, and U.S. digital securities
UAETokenizationRegulation.com
Complete UAE regulatory landscape for tokenized assets
CBDCBridge.ai
Central bank digital currency interoperability and standards
CBDCInteroperability.com
CBDC cross-border settlement protocols and compliance
DubaiTokenizedRealEstate.com
Tokenized property regulation and investment in the UAE
SaudiTokenizedRealEstate.com
Saudi real estate tokenization and regulatory frameworks
TokenisedMMF.com
Tokenized money market fund tracking — BUIDL, BENJI, MONY
DecentralizedCBDC.com
Architecture and policy debate around CBDC decentralisation
LATokenisation.com
Latin American tokenization regulation and market development
CapitalTokenization.com
Capital markets tokenization infrastructure and standards
UAETokenizedRWA.com
UAE real-world asset tokenization regulatory intelligence
Advertisement